Who is to be Blamed?
Recently, popular Indian YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia, also known as BeerBiceps, found himself at the center of a significant controversy these days after an appearance on a show " Allahbadia posed an inappropriate question to a contestant, which sparks a controversy and raises question on his very upbringing.
This remark sparked widespread outrage, leading to multiple police complaints and a broader discussion about content boundaries on digital platforms. The Supreme Court of India criticized Allahbadia's conduct but allowed him to resume his podcast, "The Ranveer Show," under the condition that he adheres to standards of morality and decency suitable for all age groups.
This incident raises important questions about the factors influencing such behavior:
Parental up-bringing: Are parents responsible for instilling values that guide appropriate or inappropriate behavior in public forums?
Peer Pressure: Do individuals feel compelled to make controversial statements to appear "cool" or gain acceptance among peers?
Hunger for Fame: Is the desire for increased visibility and fame driving content creators to cross any ethical limits?
We invite you to share your thoughts on this matter.
Who do you believe bears the most responsibility in such situations?
Is it the upbringing provided by parents, the influence of peers, or the individual's own ambition for fame?